A Canadian Response to SCO

[Max Blanco]

On 22 Aug 2003, Matthew Rice wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> This has been forwarded from the NewTLUG mailing list.  Bill Traynor [the
> original poster] hasn't been able to send this to TLUG.  Well, at least he
> and I haven't seen it show up on the list.
> 
> So I'm trying.
> 

Can I read somewhere about how this issue affects the little guy?
I have a 1995 distro of redhat.  Does this affect me?
What about if I have a 2.2 kernel built in 2000?

CLIC has been up in arms over the courtroom theatrics, but how about 
the substance?  It hasn't been clear to me why I should care.
(Sorry if that's a little blunt.)

If I read this right, as long as you stick to 2.4 kernel code, who cares?

Can you delete the offending 27 lines of code from the kernel and still 
make it crash proof and kickass...?


--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml