SCO has valid case

[Emir]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22/08/2003 16:54, Rick Tomaschuk wrote:

| Cool your jets buddy, I'm just passing along what I saw.
| I'm entitled to my opinion like everyone else.

1. No jets to cool.
2. I'm not your buddy.
3. You're making a statement of fact on something you simply have no way of
knowing.  "They have a valid case" are your exact words, I'm not misconstruing
anything.  Can that be taken as anything but a statement of fact?  I don't
think so.
4. You're entitled to your opinion, but if you want to express it in a public
forum then you ought to make it clear that it's *your* opinion and the readers
will decide how relevant it is, which in this particular case really isn't, as
we have already established you're not judge in a US Court of Law with
jurisdiction over this case.


- --
Emir.

"The rancorous Supreme Court pronouncement on the 2000 Presidential election
~ ought to remind everyone that the US' legal system is at best a lottery,
~ and at worst, deeply swayed by human vices."             -- Andrew Orlowski
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/Roa+uSy542G+Z7QRAgJ9AJ9V1iWv8yKoLmwRy4JK1Leesrjc3ACfTRLi
3AkLR5kzRP1pT8imLiE+A3A=
=ekC+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml