SCO has valid case

[bill traynor]

rickl-ZACYGPecefkNbK0NzMECUg at public.gmane.org wrote:

>I was at SCO Forum this week and viewed some of the disputed code and
>SCO's explanations both without and with NDA. They have a valid case.
>Linux kernel 2.4 to 2.6 contains AIX code which allows scalability
>beyond that which would have been available in a "regular development
>timeframe". Anyone interested in a copy of the non-nda PPT let me know
>and I'll email you a copy. I've tried several postings to the list
>server  but it does'nt seem to be working.
>  
>
Then why won't they just show everyone the code?

And I'd like a copy of the PPT, please email to btraynor-zC6tqtfhjqE at public.gmane.org

Thanks
Bill

>Rick Tomaschuk
>rickt-ZACYGPecefkNbK0NzMECUg at public.gmane.org
>Novell Resource: http://www.TorontoNUI.ca
>--
>The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
>TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
>How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
>
>  
>


--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml