<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/11/13 16:04, Thomas Milne wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGc8pF4zZspbkv2=FMsfG=eTNm_eTUV=oFP=0T+ospGcXJzTTg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Oct 31, 2013 6:09 PM, "D. Hugh Redelmeier" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org">hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> I think he's quite insightful<br>
> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/10/a-necessary-evil-what-it-takes-for-democracy-to-survive-surveillance/">http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/10/a-necessary-evil-what-it-takes-for-democracy-to-survive-surveillance/</a>></p>
<p dir="ltr">Stallman falls into the 'there's a technical solution
to everything' trap.</p>
</blockquote>
Agree. <br>
<br>
The problems are not due to technical abilities of governments or
sociaties. Problems are in how both coexist ;) And these are of more
spiritual nature, not technical.<br>
<br>
The fact itself that we consider things in terms of that duality is
warring.<br>
<br>
As of that, Stallman is certainly not a visioner, for me. Well, he
still crowls well with his ideas. <br>
<br>
zb.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>