<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<small>Sorry for top-posting here but I figured since my answer is
so fresh (and I don't want you to hunt below for non-existent
interleaved responses), I would top-post this once...<br>
<br>
How about I run something like...<br>
<br>
sudo apt-get remove *volution*<br>
<br>
?<br>
<br>
Chris<br>
<br>
On 12-05-07 04:00 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:</small>
<blockquote
cite="mid:alpine.LRH.2.02.1205071538420.22298-zb/h1I55lmemYXyjjU2hqtBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">| From: Mr Chris Aitken <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:chris-n/jUll39koHNgV/OU4+dkA@public.gmane.org"><chris-n/jUll39koHNgV/OU4+dkA@public.gmane.org></a>
Thanks for your supplying the output to help diagnose the issue.
| chris@chris-HP-Compaq-dc5750-Small-Form-Factor:~$ dpkg --list '*volution*'
| Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| |
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
| |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
| | |/ Name Version Description
| +++-==============-==============-============================================
| un evolution <none> (no description available)
| ii evolution-data 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 evolution database backend server
| ii evolution-data 3.2.0-0ubuntu1 architecture independent files for Evolution
| un evolution-data <none> (no description available)
| un evolution-data <none> (no description available)
| un libreoffice-ev <none> (no description available)
You actually DO have bits (but not all) of evolution. Evolution
appears to be spread among several packages. You have two packages
with names that start with "evolution-data" installed (unfortunately
the report appears to truncate long names).
| > apt-get --just-print upgrade
| The following packages have been kept back:
| linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic software-center
| The following packages will be upgraded:
| accountsservice acpid aisleriot alsa-utils app-install-data-partner
| appmenu-qt apport apport-gtk apt apt-transport-https apt-utils aptdaemon
| aptdaemon-data apturl apturl-common at-spi2-core bamfdaemon banshee
| banshee-extension-soundmenu banshee-extension-ubuntuonemusicstore baobab
| bind9-host binutils bluez bluez-alsa bluez-cups bluez-gstreamer brasero
| brasero-cdrkit brasero-common brltty bzip2 ca-certificates-java checkbox
| checkbox-gtk colord command-not-found command-not-found-data compiz
| compiz-core compiz-gnome compiz-plugins-default compiz-plugins-main-default
| cups cups-bsd cups-client cups-common cups-ppdc deja-dup desktop-file-utils
| dnsutils dpkg empathy empathy-common eog evince evince-common
| evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-common file-roller firefox
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Updates have been released for both of these packages. That's what
update-manager is pestering you about.
If you remove them, update-manager should stop pestering you about
them. It might be the case that you have other packages that depend
on them, making removal difficult.
The same approach would work with the other packages update-manager is
bugging you about.
To be honest, I find it more bother to remove packages that the distro
thought might be useful than it is to apply all updates that
update-manager suggests.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gtalug.org/">http://gtalug.org/</a>
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists">http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>