<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<br>> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:28:32 -0400<br>> From: jamon.camisso-H217xnMUJC0sA/PxXw9srA@public.gmane.org<br>> To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4@public.gmane.org<br>> Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Anyone tried Bell's Fibe TV?<br>> <br>> On 05/15/2011 09:06 PM, john.moniz-rieW9WUcm8FFJ04o6PK0Fg@public.gmane.org wrote:<br>> > So instead you get Rogers shenanigans?<br>> <br>> No traffic shaping if that's what you mean. Near static IP, no blocked<br>> ports. Speed is better than advertised too.<br><br>No competitors allowed (until recently and still very limited),
blocked smtp ports (same as Bell), subscribers kicked out for having
server ports open. All sorts of past baggage that I can't be bothered to
go in to because the point is not to compare the two companies blow by blow, but just to say that neither are angels. Personally, I can't wait to get rid of my only remaining Rogers service - TV.<br><br> </body>
</html>