I'm not sure if you are looking for a document management system, or a document editing system. I found this very interesting though.<br><br><a href="http://www.alfresco.com/">http://www.alfresco.com/</a><br><br>Allows for collaborative editing, and management.<br>
<br>Dave<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Aaron Vegh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aaronvegh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org">aaronvegh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all,<br>
Thanks so far for your answers, both off- and on-list. I've been reviewing these responses and trying to wrap my head around this problem. Ultimately, I'm not looking to have a role in this project; ideally I'd like to find someone who I could feel comfortable introducing to my client, that can run with this problem. I have some concerns, however, with what I've read so far.<br>
<br>
1. Substituting OO.o for MS Office doesn't strike me as a winning proposition. In my (albeit limited) use of the application, I've come away with the impression that while it may solve some issues, it will create others. In the end, the client will end up with different headaches altogether.<br>
<br>
2. LaTeX or DocBook XML, while clearly a respected choice by this group, is also to be approached with great caution. The assumption being that non-technical users will balk at it. I get that, for sure. But I still wonder if, with the right template design, a LaTeX or DocBook expert couldn't put together a sample document, and arrange for training of the staff who will use this. I think once people saw this text-based file on the one hand, then saw a single command given and boom! instant, perfect HTML and PDF versions -- they would find that very persuasive. Perhaps persuasive enough to actually learn and use this thing.<br>
<br>
Let me be a bit more specific now. The client is the Ontario Legislature. They are required to produce "Hansards", verbatim transcripts of the proceedings of the legislature. These documents are published on their web site. Here's an example of a PDF of a recent legislative session:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.ontla.on.ca/house-proceedings/transcripts/files_pdf/29-JAN-2009_L108.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ontla.on.ca/house-proceedings/transcripts/files_pdf/29-JAN-2009_L108.pdf</a><br>
<br>
You'll note that the document is both quite long and features a fairly complicated layout, not to mention a large number of individual paragraph and character styles. There are also errors in the rendering of this document (for example, several blank pages). The original documents produced in Word are done with very specific Word styles, so I would say that the users are slightly above your average "non-technical".<br>
<br>
My thinking is that, any solution that requires post-processing is not adequate. They already have a system that has several idiosyncrasies, and exchanging that for another one (OO-based) is probably not going to be accepted.<br>
<br>
If there are any serious, knowledgeable advocates of a clean document creation pipeline, I'm looking forward to hearing from you. If you feel this can be done with OO without compromising the translation between formats, show me some examples using documents as complex as the kind at issue here! :-)<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Aaron.<br><font color="#888888">
--<br>
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: <a href="http://gtalug.org/" target="_blank">http://gtalug.org/</a><br>
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns<br>
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: <a href="http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists" target="_blank">http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists</a><br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>