<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7226.0">
<TITLE>Re: [TLUG]: Looking for ISP, again</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I'll chime in a favorable for cybernet. Been on them about 6 months now, great service, and don't care about the linux boxes on my network<BR>
D<BR>
Dave Bour<BR>
Desktop Solution Center<BR>
905.381.0077<BR>
dcbour@desktopsolutioncenter.ca<BR>
<BR>
For those who just want it to work...<BR>
Giving you complete IT peace of mind.<BR>
<BR>
(Sent via Blackberry)<BR>
PIN 30073084 (as of May 9,2005)<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: owner-tlug@ss.org <owner-tlug@ss.org><BR>
To: tlug@ss.org <tlug@ss.org><BR>
Sent: Tue Aug 09 10:12:48 2005<BR>
Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Looking for ISP, again<BR>
<BR>
On 8/8/05, Ian Zimmerman <nobrowser@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>
> I am sorry if this dead horse has been beaten enough already ...<BR>
><BR>
> Just moved to the area (in 905 actually) and looking for a broadband ISP<BR>
> that is at least not Linux hostile.<BR>
><BR>
> I have read the entire June-July thread about this.<BR>
<BR>
I looked at canadianisp.com as suggested; among the DSL crowd, cybernet<BR>
and teksavvy look best, anyone here has experience with them?<BR>
<BR>
I find the site a bit suspect, as the people who submitted the ratings are not<BR>
revealed or their reasons. For all I know, the ISPs could have simply paid for<BR>
being placed well.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks, Ian<BR>
--<BR>
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: <A HREF="http://tlug.ss.org">http://tlug.ss.org</A><BR>
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns<BR>
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: <A HREF="http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml">http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml</A><BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>